Implementing effective methods to deal with disruptions can help shipping companies avoid unnecessary expenses.

To avoid taking on costs, various businesses start thinking about alternative channels. For instance, as a result of long delays at major international ports in certain African countries, some businesses urge shippers to build up new tracks as well as conventional routes. This tactic detects and utilises other lesser-used ports. As opposed to relying on an individual major commercial port, once the delivery company notice heavy traffic, they redirect items to more efficient ports across the coastline and then transport them inland via rail or road. Based on maritime experts, this plan has many advantages not merely in alleviating pressure on overrun hubs, but also in the economic growth of appearing areas. Company leaders like AD Ports Group CEO may likely trust this view.

In supply chain management, interruption within a route of a given transport mode can significantly impact the entire supply chain and, often times, even bring it to a halt. As such, business leaders like P&O Ferries CEO and Maersk CEO work hard to add flexibility within the mode of transport they rely on in a proactive way. For example, some companies utilise a flexible logistics strategy that hinges on numerous modes of transport. They encourage their logistic partners to mix up their mode of transport to add all modes: vehicles, trains, motorcycles, bicycles, vessels and even helicopters. Investing in multimodal transportation methods like a mixture of rail, road and maritime transport as well as considering different geographical entry points minimises the vulnerabilities and risks associated with depending on one mode.

Having a robust supply chain strategy could make firms more resilient to supply-chain disruptions. There are two kinds of supply management issues: the very first is due to the supplier side, particularly supplier selection, supplier relationship, supply preparation, transport and logistics. The second one deals with demand management problems. These are issues related to product introduction, manufacturer product line administration, demand preparation, product prices and promotion preparation. Therefore, what typical techniques can firms adopt to boost their power to sustain their operations when a major interruption hits? In accordance with a recently available study, two strategies are increasingly proving to work whenever a disruption happens. The initial one is called a flexible supply base, and the second one is named economic supply incentives. Although a lot of in the market would argue that sourcing from the single provider cuts expenses, it can cause dilemmas as demand varies or in the case of an interruption. Therefore, relying on numerous companies can offset the risk connected with sole sourcing. Having said that, economic supply incentives work if the buyer provides incentives to induce more manufacturers to enter the marketplace. The buyer could have more flexibility this way by moving production among manufacturers, particularly in areas where there is a small number of manufacturers.